Started From the Bottom, Now We’re…Average

2015 was the year of Bryce Harper. He led qualified hitters with a 197 wRC+, the highest since the turn of the century among players not named Barry Bonds. This was a vast improvement on his already-impressive 2014 season, in which he totaled a 115 wRC+.

Depending on how you look at things, you could say Bryce Harper was the most improved batter in 2015. I choose not to for two reasons: 1) it’s too easy, and 2) it makes this article more fun. There’s also another more objective reason: with only 395 plate appearances in 2014, Harper didn’t qualify for the batting title.

This poses a question: what minimum do we set to determine who improved the most between 2014 and 2015? If we say that the player needed to qualify for the batting title each year, we get Chris Davis as the most improved batter, who increased his wRC+ from 94 in 2014 to 147 in 2015. If we set no minimum, our wonder-boy is none other than notorious slugger Carlos Torres, the Mets pitcher who upped his wRC+ from -100 to 491.

Clearly, there needs to be some minimum. For the purpose of the article, I’ve decided to set it at 100 PA. This seems a reasonably small enough number to include a wide array of players, but large enough to get rid of anomalies (I’m looking at you Carlos). When we set this minimum, we discover that the batter whose wRC+ increased the most between 2014 and 2015 is… Ryan Raburn. However, since Jeff Sullivan already talked about Raburn, I decided to go with the next name on the list: J.B. Shuck.

If you don’t know who that is, I don’t blame you. I didn’t until I started this research. If you do know him, I’m going to guess that you’re either a White Sox, Indians, or Angels fan. Either that, or you have more time to watch baseball than a college student taking a full course-load of credits. Who’s to say?

The reason the casual fan might not know Shuck is because, well, he’s not exactly a star player. Here are the players with the lowest wRC+ in 2014 of those with at least 100 PAs:

That’s right, he was literally the worst batter that year. Almost as bad as if I were to join the majors. It should be no surprise, then, that he was able to improve so much — he had the lowest starting point. Even so, he still had needed to improve quite drastically in order to surpass Harper’s wRC+ improvement. And that’s exactly what he did:

In 2015, Shuck improved so much that he almost managed to be an average player. But how did he manage to do it? Was it a matter of luck, or did he actually get better?

The number that stands out the most in Shuck’s 2014 season is his .146 BABIP (batting average on balls in play). For those of you that don’t know, that number is quite bad. Like, less than half of what it should be. His BABIP in other seasons is right around league average, so something must have gone amiss last year. Looking at the underlying numbers, some things showed up:

So. His FB% and Pull% numbers were way up as compared to other years. For some context, the league-average FB% has been approximately 34% the past two years, while Pull% has been approximately 40%. These numbers suggest that Shuck spent too much time trying to pull the ball over the fence two years ago, and the video suggests the same thing. Here’s an example of him trying to do just this to a pitch on the outside corner, but instead weakly grounding to first. You can see how he opens his hips before he even starts his swing, forcing him to simply slap at the ball if he wants to make any contact:

And here he is in 2015, driving a similar pitch into left field:

The cause of his change in approach is hard to say. He did get a new hitting coach to start off the year, switching from Jim Eppard to Don Baylor. From 2013 to 2014, the Angels as a team increased their FB% from 33% to 34% and their Pull% from 37% to 42%, so that argument does have some merit. Regardless of the reason, it’s clear that it had an effect. Here’s Shuck’s ISO by zone:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As can be seen on the left, Shuck had trouble hitting anything not on the inside edge of the plate in 2014. This past year, he learned to control more of the strike zone, and even though there’s less red than there was in 2014, there’s also a lot less dark blue. Shuck drove the ball from all parts of the zone to all parts of the field, and his numbers improved because of it.

While Shuck may not be an All-Star anytime soon, his year-to-year improvement is truly remarkable. If he can go from being the worst hitter in baseball to an average one, anyone can. And if that doesn’t inspire the Brendan Ryans of the world, I don’t know what will.





I tweet about disappointing sports teams @briansreiff

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cameron
8 years ago

Enjoyable article. Nice work 🙂

Eric
8 years ago

I like what you did here I really do, but when it comes to statistics and the word average, it solely depends upon your definition of average. Furthermore, I contend that the base metrics used to convey an ‘average’ do not encapsulate everything good a player does, especially on offense.

Typically what is used to define an average on this site are rate stats or some higher form of them. Sure there is the slash line, AVE/OBP/SLG/OPS, then you have OPS+, wRC, and ultimately WAR.

But what if I told you that for offense at least, you can have a statistic that could be expressed as both a RATE and VOLUME stat, and it could double as BOTH a player development tool, while allowing managers/coaches to optimize their batting lineup?

Essentially this tool captures EVERYTHING good players do at the plate or on the base paths while playing offense. Enter the stats I created called HEWCO, CCR, and BSM. Together, they make the slash line stats above obsolete.

You set your lineup and know your hit tool capabilities of your players via HEWCO and CCR. BSM gets to the volume output of runs and RBI because its a stat based on sequence of events.

I don’t think much of AVE/OBP/SLG/OPS, wRC, OPS+ or oWAR anymore because HEWCO, CCR, and BSM tell me more about a player anyway. I’ll give you a taste, none of the traditional stats above capture the true value of contact outs and errors.

If you want to see any of the work I have done you can email me at thecrazybaseballcoach@gmail.com

troybrunomember
8 years ago

Great article… notably, I think Astros fans might know him the best. Per your findings, Shuck has had to migrate his game from speed / contact to a more balanced hitting repertoire.

Note his BA draft report: “Shuck is a contact hitter who struck out just 24 times in three college seasons, and he can use his solid speed and fine instincts to steal bases.”

And the comments from when he was HOU’s #13 prospect: ” His swing has a short, flat path to the ball, spraying liners to all fields…. Shuck has plus-plus speed…”

The fact that his original game didn’t play in the pros and he has adjusted is truly a testament.