Should David Ortiz Play First Base In the World Series?

I have the mixed blessing of living in New England, so I unavoidably run into local sports radio once in a while. They’re already looking ahead to the Red Sox’ inevitable World Series appearance, and of course given David Ortiz’s unprecedented combination of offensive skills and just incredible foot pain/immobility, there’s a legitimate question of whether the Red Sox should play him in the field when they lose the DH in World Series road games. Just a quick-hit here on some of the relevant numbers.

I’m not going to address in this article the extent to which playing the field might limit his ability to hit or run. I don’t dispute that that could be significant, but I have no idea how to value that.

The way I see it, there are three options:

1. Move Hanley Ramirez over to 3B, play Ortiz at 1B, take Travis Shaw out of the lineup.
2. Replace Ramirez with Ortiz at 1B, keep Shaw.
3. Don’t start Ortiz, but do pinch-hit with him in a high-leverage situation.

We’ll make the following assumptions: I’m going to estimate that Ramirez will have the same defensive value at 3B that he had last year in LF (-22.9 runs), and I’m going to further estimate that Ortiz will have the defensive rating of some of the worst 1Bs in baseball over the past few seasons (-25 runs). Travis Shaw was worth 6.6 runs of defense playing mostly 3B this year. Ortiz was worth 27.6 runs of offense + baserunning, Ramirez 17.1, and Shaw -10.3. We’ll estimate that playing Ortiz would get him 4.4 plate appearances per start, whereas if he doesn’t start, he gets one plate appearance in a situation that has a leverage index of 2.

Scenario 1: Ortiz gives you 2.6 runs at 1B, Ramirez -5.8 runs at 3B, total of -3.2 runs.
Scenario 2: Ortiz gives you 2.6 runs at 1B, Shaw -3.7 runs at 3B, total of -1.1 runs.
Scenario 3: Ramirez gives you 1.8 runs at 1B, Shaw -3.7 runs at 3B, and Ortiz gives you 27.6*(1/4.4)*2 = 12.5 runs at PH, total of 10.6 runs.

Seems like the best option here by a decently wide margin is to use him as a pinch-hitter, and I’m surprised at how much of the value comes from just the pinch-hit appearance. Fairly robust to my assumptions, too — if you assume a leverage index of 1 in his one plate appearance, you still get the highest total with Ortiz as a PH. You could also give him a defensive rating of -15 (which would be incredibly generous) and the PH scenario comes out on top. Anything else I’m missing? Other lineup options for the Red Sox?





10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
eyesoverthecity
7 years ago

The playoffs are an extremely small sample size, so you are drastically overrating defense here. Think Daniel Murphy last year… he is dreadful in the field, but when you hit HR in 8 consecutive games then who cares.

Ortiz’s value is similar in this situation.

The obvious choice is Ortiz plays 1B, because his 4/5 ABs a game are FAR AND AWAY MORE VALUABLE than whatever his defense may or may not hurt him. He’s a career .295 / .409 / .553 / .962 in the post season.

(If anything, they start him at 1B and remove him late in games when they have a lead for better defense.)

eyesoverthecity
7 years ago
Reply to  jacaissie

True sample size cuts both ways, but if you limit your best hitter to possibly one AB a game, then you should be fired from your job.

He has extensive career postseason numbers you can draw from for analysis. He’ll be fine.

Chill
7 years ago

In a word, yes.

Chill
7 years ago
Reply to  jacaissie

As good as Hanley Ramirez has been, Ortiz’s bat is far more irreplaceable in the Red Sox lineup, especially with regard to helping balance the lineup between left handed and right handed hitters. So, at worst, you sit Hanley and use him as a pinch hitter or defensive replacement late in games. Alternatively, 3B has been a black hole for the Sox, offensively speaking, since the all-star break. If you’re feeling bold, you slide HanRam to the hot corner and put Papi at first. What you don’t do is put the greatest DH in history and one of the greatest postseason performers of all time, on the bench. The premise of the article is flawed. David Ortiz is not a total butcher defensively and, with all the love in my heart, Travis Shaw is not a starting 3B in the major leagues. There is no plausible scenario in which sitting David Ortiz on the bench increases the odds of the Red Sox winning in the World Series.

GDUBSS
7 years ago

One thing you did miss was you forgot to add in the possibility of a pinch hit appearance for Hanley in Scenario 2. Also would have been neat to look at how much of a difference a lefty or righty starting pitcher has on your calculation

GDUBSS
7 years ago
Reply to  jacaissie

I didn’t mean for it to get that involved. I just meant to do 2 calculations. One assuming a righty starting pitcher and one assuming a lefty starting pitcher. Ortiz hits better vs. righties and Hanley hits better vs lefties so maybe it’ll change what your calc says the redsox should do. Just something interesting to look at. You could just assume their average offensive production for the pinch hit to keep it simple. But anyways, thanks for the article, it was a nice short good read!