Ichiro, Grounded

Ichiro Suzuki is a singular talent. He is fast, seeming to fly all over the outfield. He steals bases with great success — 45 while being caught only twice in 2006. He has a legendary cannon for a right arm. And he hits like a machine. He racked up over 2,000 hits in his first nine major league seasons, and was the second fastest to that milestone (to Al Simmons, who reached it in 12 fewer games). He does not hit many home runs or a particularly impressive number of doubles or triples. He piles up his hits by putting the ball on the ground and running to first base. Joe Posnanski recently explored Ichiro’s hitting prowess, coming to the conclusion that he is one of the few truly unique players in history.

What if Ichiro were slow? What type of player would he be if he were not able to knock out so many ground ball hits? For one possible answer to this question, I compared the rate at which Ichiro reached base on ground balls to the American League average. Baseball Reference lists batting average splits by hit trajectory, and I compiled the league numbers from 2003 through 2009. The league statistics for the first two years of Ichiro’s career, 2001 and 2002, differ significantly from the next seven, possibly due to different methods of categorizing ground balls. I omitted those two years, as well as this season’s small sample. During the seven seasons from 2003-2009, American League players consistently reached base at a .240-.245 average on grounders. Ichiro beat the average in every year, with a high of .368 on ground balls in 2007.

To get an idea of what type of player Ichiro would look like without all those extra hits, I normalized his ground ball hit rate to the league average for each season and recalculated his batting totals. This adjustment cost him 42 hits in 2007 and 44 in 2004, and no less than 14 in any of the seven seasons. For simplicity, I removed only singles from his batting line. I then searched for a player with career statistics similar to Ichiro’s adjusted totals and came up with an interesting candidate. The following table displays Ichiro’s statistics over the past seven years (again, discarding 2001 and 2002) without his extra ground ball hits, side by side with Curt Flood’s career averages.

Table: Curt Flood versus Adjusted Ichiro
Statistics Per 600 Plate Appearances
Adj. Ichiro Curt Flood
Doubles 19 23
Triples 6 4
Home Runs 8 7
Walks 37 38
Strikeouts 56 53
Average .291 .293
OBP .338 .342
Slugging .391 .389
OPS .729 .732
BABIP .313 .314

This adjusted version of Ichiro is a near statistical clone of Flood, who played center field in the 1960s for the Cardinals. Flood was also a great fielder, winning gold gloves in each of his last seven full seasons. He is most famous, however, for starting a chain reaction that led to the free agency system when he refused a trade to the Phillies after the 1969 season. It marked the effective end of his career at just 31, as he played only 13 games in a comeback attempt in 1971. Despite now being inextricably linked with baseball labor history and not often mentioned for his playing ability, Flood was actually a surprisingly valuable hitter. He played in the offensively-challenged 1960s and was significantly above average with the bat for most of his career. Ichiro’s adjusted stats, in today’s era of power and on-base percentage, would be far less impressive.

Of course, this is all merely a thought experiment. Ichiro probably does have some control over where he hits the ball, as his New York Times profile explains. FanGraphs’s Jack Moore also explored Ichiro’s propensity to hit grounders to the opposite side of the infield at an abnormal rate. Thus, simply removing some of Ichiro’s hits does not show us the player he would actually be if he were not so fast. If he could not get on base so often on this type of batted ball, it is likely he would adjust his approach and that his numbers would reach a different equilibrium. What removing all of the extra singles does show us is just how much value those ground ball hits supply. Without them, Ichiro’s numbers look fairly pedestrian, especially in the era in which he has played. With them, Ichiro is Ichiro, and he will go down as one of the greatest and most dynamic hitters in baseball history.

This article originally ran at Ball Your Base.





6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brendan
13 years ago

So basically, if Ichiro, with no speed, used a style of hitting that requires speed, he would be a worse hitter. Isn’t this a little useless? Why wouldn’t he change his approach if his current one wasn’t working? There’s a reason he’s on the HR derby ballot each year, and it’s not so 50 thousand people can laugh at him at the derby.

Stephan
13 years ago

Saying it is useless is a bit unfair I think, he wasn’t trying to make a case other than trying to put into perspective what makes Ichiro Suzuki so unique… And by the logic of *you shouldn’t do articles that speculate people to be what they aren’t* I feel like there would be many articles thrown to the wayside here at fangraphs.

lincolndude
13 years ago

Thanks for the comments (and thanks, FanGraphs, for running this!) As I acknowledge in the article, of course Ichiro would change his approach if it wasn’t working. And of course he would not pick a style of play ill-suited to his skill set.

I start out with a “what if,” but I was trying to do, and I explain this in the last paragraph, is quantify what those infield singles mean for Ichiro. We know he gets more than other players, but just how important are they to his game? Normalize to league average and you see that his stats look pedestrian in this era. So the answer — a lot. Those infield singles (over and above average rates) are what push Ichiro’s value from league average hitter to unique, singular talent.

Useless analysis, maybe, but as Stephan accurately points out, you could make that claim about a LOT of baseball writing. Hopefully some people found it to be of passing interest.

Stephan
13 years ago

I was also thinking about this a little bit more and have come to think that postings liket his can be very useful.

Think of an example of a hitting coach who is trying to teach someone how to be effective in some way shape or form. The student happens to be very good at creating contact but not very hard contact and also does not have great discipline at the plate, even after repeated attempts to teach him how to be. So, what if it is easier to teach him how to direct a ball in such a manner and to get out of the box to 1st base fast enough that you can effectively teach him how to have a high babip on grounders.

It may be unorthodox but in this particular situation it would improve the hitter greatly and not only that, there is already prescedence to this now in Ichiro. In this you have isolated one of the traits that makes a hitter successful, perhaps this doesn’t say specifically how one would go about the teaching, but it is a starting point that may lead to discussion in the future and even in the now, this article is plenty useful in my opinion.

B N
13 years ago

I found this fairly interesting actually. However, I think that just having extra hits isn’t all that makes Ichiro a singular talent. As has been noted, his OBP is still only above average, not great. And he’s not hitting for massive power, though he has pop.

I’ve always wondered if his hitting style allows him to get a higher AVG (and maybe even higher OBP) against tough pitching. That would make him MUCH more valuable than the averages would indicate. A hit against Greinke is worth more than a hit against Suppan, in my opinion. Do you know if anyone has ever looked at that? Ichiro’s AVG and OBP performance against pitchers that tend to be aces? (i.e. have significantly lower opponent AVG and OBP than the average pitcher)

In my opinion, an article like that would be gold.

B N
13 years ago

Doing a bit of cursory research by just leafing through the Yahoo page for Ichiro vs pitchers, it does seem to hold that Ichiro has seldom been shut down- even by ace pitchers. Against them he appears to become a bit more ordinary, but seems to do well against certain types of pitchers (his numbers against Sabathia, Randy Johnson, and Lackey are spectacular). Guys he seems to have really struggled against were K-Rod, Pedro, Harden, and Wang.

Seems like to me he can remain very successful against ace pitchers that also rely on inducing fielded outs, but is vulnerable to deceptive strikeout aces that throw outside the zone? It seems like to me that having a guy that can maintain a 300 OBP against an ace and can steal bases is someone who can help you win close games. Unless of course you have young Pedro, with young K-Rod to close. Then you might as well bench Ichiro. 😉