Most of the all-time great hitters, since I’ve been watching, are terrible fielders. Sorted by wOBA, here are the top 15 hitters since the year 2000 and their cumulative career defensive scores.
Here’s the top 15 cumulative defensive scorers, along with their ISO scores. Jim Thome had an ISO of .288, for reference.
The guy who can knock the crap out of the ball and the guy who can make the SportsCenter highlight defensive plays are usually different people. Unfortunately, this tradeoff only really hurts fans. The ‘defensive replacement’ comes in late in games and is rarely noticed. We like web gems, and we like bombs, why not have both?
We’ve probably never seen the world’s best defensive player.
Hitting an MLB fastball is hard. It’s a very specific, rare skill set. Playing outfield, however, is something to which athletes from other sports could adapt. I bet Cam Newton could play right field, for example. There are some soccer goalies who could probably play shortstop. There are guys at every position that are wasting away in the minors or worse because they can’t hit the elite pitching. If there’s a freak athlete that can jump and catch balls three feet over the wall, I want to see it.
The designated fielder prevents injuries and keeps the stars in the game.
I’m having trouble finding data, but my guess is that a fair portion of playing injuries happen on defense. Especially for outfielders running into each other and walls. A designated fielder takes guys prone to aches and pains off the field but lets them contribute on offense, even in the National League. It also makes big contracts less risky in the National League, which might lose out on an aging slugger like Albert Pujols.
It adds an element of strategy.
There will be tremendous temptation to play a catcher as your designated fielder. They make your pitchers better and prevent stolen bases. That said, what if you had a second-best catcher who could hit but an excellent outfielder who can’t hit? The decision gets cloudy. Teams might strategize based on the potential base-stealing skills of the opponent versus their expectations of fly balls.
A designated baserunner too?
My vision of the designated baserunner is more like a once-a-game power up you can use rather than a permanent fixture. I’ve always though it was sort of lame that you had to take a guy completely out of the game to get somebody to run for him. Currently, that dooms pinch-runners to the eighth or ninth inning. Well, I and most fans enjoy stolen-base attempts and guys stretching a hit for an extra base. It’s one of the more exciting parts of the game. We know Albert Pujols isn’t going to steal too often. Most catchers aren’t exactly speed demons either. So, I propose, once a game, managers will be able to pinch-run without making the guy leave the game. Could you imagine Usain Bolt on the base pads? If teams wanted speed bad enough, it’s possible.
The right equilibrium.
I like to see baseball with a constant ebb and flow of teams threatening to overtake each other. The designated fielder adds one more guy who can hit to the lineup. Defensive shortstops and catchers won’t be weakly grounding out and popping up quite so often. The ball will be in play more often and will sometimes be negated by amazing plays by the designated fielder. Catchers with rocket arms will be behind the plate more often. But, they’ll face more elite baserunners. Would you pitch around Giancarlo Stanton, if you knew an elite baserunner would run for him? Do you bring on a lefty to hold the runner on?
I favor letting pitchers hit, however. I see this as a National League first experiment. The sacrifice bunt attempt is a pretty exciting part of play, and the shock of watching a hurler rope a hit to left-center is worth it. I don’t want to be inundated with offense; just enough to spice things up a little.