Will We See a Record Number of Three True Outcomes Specialists in 2018?

Last season was the year of the three true outcomes specialist.  Aaron Judge’s dominant three true outcomes season was the most prominent example of this: he ranked second in home runs (52) and walks (127) and first in strikeouts (208).  In total, 57% of his plate appearances resulted in one of the three true outcomes.  He was the American League Rookie of the Year and in the running for the 2017 American League Most Valuable Player award, finishing second.  His performance helped the Yankees reach the American League Division Series.

We know that the three true outcomes rate has been increasing.  In part, this is due to the average player increasing his rate of home runs, strikeouts and walks.  But there is also the unusual player in the mold of Judge who takes an extreme approach at the plate resulting in dominant three true outcomes seasons.  The number of these hitters has been increasing over time.

Figure 1. Three True Outcomes Specialists per Season, 1960-2017

View post on imgur.com

Figure 1 shows the number of dominant three true outcomes player seasons over time.  To get here I examined all players since 1913 with at least 170 plate appearances in a season.  I considered a dominant season one with a three true outcomes rate of at least 49%.  There have been 132 player seasons with a three true outcomes rate of at least 49%.  All of them have taken place after 1960.

The graph shows that the number of dominant seasons has been increasing over time.  Since Dave Nicholson first did it in 1962, most years have had at least one player cross the threshold.  Since 1994, every season has had at least one.  From 2001 to 2010 there were four seasons with five three outcomes hitters.  There was six in 2012 and eight in 2014.  The trend is currently peaking with 13 in 2016 and 16 in 2017.  The trend is a bit more extreme but similar to the average increases in three outcomes rates over time.  It seems that more players pursue (and teams tolerate) an approach to hitting that includes extreme rates of the three outcomes.

It is worth pointing out that those 16 players in 2017 account for about 4% of all players with at least 170 at-bats.  Three true outcomes specialists are more common but still rare.  Who are those 16 players?  Table 1 lists them including the home run, walk and strikeout rates, and the combined three true outcomes rate for the year.

Table 1. Three True Outcomes Specialists, 2017

Player HR/PA BB/PA SO/PA TTO
Joey Gallo 8% 14% 37% 59%
Aaron Judge 8% 19% 31% 57%
Ryan Schimpf 7% 14% 36% 56%
Chris Davis 5% 12% 37% 54%
Miguel Sano 6% 11% 36% 53%
Alex Avila 4% 16% 32% 52%
Mike Zunino 6% 9% 37% 51%
Drew Robinson 5% 12% 35% 51%
Jabari Blash 3% 14% 34% 51%
Keon Broxton 4% 9% 38% 51%
Chris Carter 4% 10% 37% 50%
Mike Napoli 6% 10% 34% 50%
Kyle Schwarber 6% 12% 31% 49%
Matt Olson 11% 10% 28% 49%
Cameron Rupp 4% 10% 34% 49%
Eric Thames 6% 14% 30% 49%
Jake Marisnick 6% 8% 35% 49%
2017 Averages 3% 9% 21% 33%

The list includes many of the unique player stories of the year.  Aaron Judge’s rookie year was historic.  Joey Gallo made waves, particularly for his extreme three true outcomes rates.  Miguel Sano was an All-Star who helped lead the Twins to a bounce back year and a wildcard spot.  Eric Thames was a surprise story of the year, returning from a year in Japan and sparking the Brewers to an early lead in the National League Central.

Notable about this list is the young cohort of hitters who have consistently taken the all or nothing approach of the three true outcomes specialist.  Judge, Olson, and Blash all made their MLB debut in 2017.  Gallo still qualified as a rookie despite making his debut in 2016.  Keon Broxton, Ryan Schimpf, and Kyle Schwarber are in their second year.  Sano has been a specialist for three years running.  Sure, there are old hands like Napoli and Carter, and Davis who take the all or nothing approach, but the record number of specialists the last couple years have been due to this young cohort of three true outcomes specialists.  A new record will come down to 2018 rookies who practice this all or nothing approach heading into their major league debuts, and the number of teams willing to tolerate the strikeouts that come with this approach.





4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Augustine
6 years ago

Interesting. I understand this isn’t really a part of your thesis, but I’d like to see if there are year to year consistencies; have the same hitters appeared on the list, year by year, using the criteria you’ve outlined to make a hitter a 3TO specialist? Can we reasonably assume that this is a norm for some of these guys or is 2017 an example of random variation?

tb.25
6 years ago

I would like to add a tidbit I heard over the weekend from a radio show I heard:

The old philosophy of stringing together a few hits, especially late in a game, is dying as reliever usage AND skill increases. The one or two (large) hit sequence that scores a run is easier to achieve than the four or five (small/whatever type) hit sequence of yesteryear.

Essentially, the current reliever use environment supports sluggers who are more likely to be TTO – they can hit the big bomb, strike out by these relievers, and may be pitched around due to their increased (relative to average) ability to do damage late in a game.

Michael Augustine
6 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

That’s a good point.