Whiffs of Success? Theo Rolls the Dice
Jeff Sullivan recently sent up a warning flare regarding Kris Bryant’s potential swing and miss problems, and this post is essentially riffing off that one, so you’ll probably want to read that first if you haven’t already checked it out. I’m using strikeout rate rather than contact rate, but the message is similar.
Bryant isn’t alone among Cubs prospects with contact avoidance issues. Here’s what some of their bigger names did last year:
Player Level K% wRC+
Javier Baez MLB 41.0 51
Arismendy Alcantara MLB 31.0 70
Jorge Soler MLB 24.7 146
Kris Bryant AAA 28.6 164
Three of those four (i.e., the non-Alcantaras) are thought to be integral parts of The Future for the Cubs. But those are strikeout rates that have not generally led to long-term career success.
Here are the top ten career K rates for hitters with over 5000 plate appearances:
Player K% wRC+ WAR
Adam Dunn 28.6 123 22.7
Ryan Howard 28.1 126 19.9
Jose Hernandez 27.3 86 12.9
Carlos Pena 26.8 117 16.9
B.J. Upton 26.4 99 21.7
Jim Thome 24.7 145 67.7
Dave Kingman 24.4 113 20.4
Gorman Thomas 24.4 114 20.4
Dan Uggla 24.2 110 22.8
Dean Palmer 24.2 104 11.0
So it’s not impossible to have a long and relatively successful career striking out more than a quarter of the time, but it hasn’t happened much – just five times using my admittedly somewhat arbitrary 5000 PA cutoff. With strikeout rates continuing to rise, a few more players will edge ahead of Dean Palmer in the coming years, but in all likelihood, many more will fall by the wayside long before reaching that somewhat less than august plateau. As Sullivan points out, players who whiff this often need to max out their other skills in order to be useful to a team, putting enormous pressure on those other skills to develop.
And there does seem to be a correlation between hitters’ strikeout rates and overall team success, as Joe Sheehan has noted elsewhere. Here are the teams with the five highest hitter K rates from last year:
Cubs 24.2 73-89
Astros 23.8 70-92
Marlins 22.9 77-85
Braves 22.6 79-83
Reinsdorfs 22.4 73-89
None of these teams came close to making the playoffs. You have to go all the way down to tenth on the list to find a playoff team (the Nats, at 21.0%).
And here are the five least K-lacious teams:
Royals 16.3 89-73
A’s 17.7 88-74
Rays 18.1 77-85
Tigers 18.3 90-72
Cards 18.6 90-72
Yankees 18.6 84-78
Numerate readers will have grasped that there are actually six teams on this list, since the Cards and Yankees tied at 18.6%. Only the Rays and the Evil Empire failed to make the playoffs, and only the Rays failed to break .500.
Not all of the young Cubs windmill at the plate: Addison Russell and Kyle Schwarber kept their K rates under 20% last year in the minors, as did Anthony Rizzo and Starlin Castro in the majors. And as Sullivan noted, players do develop – Bryant et. al. are not necessarily trapped for eternity in the seventh level of Strikeout Hell. But for now, a significant part Theo Epstein’s plan to bring glory to Wrigleyville depends on whether these players can either find a way to strike out less, or to succeed without doing so, something that few have managed thus far.
I'm a recovering lawyer and unrecovered Cubs fan who writes about baseball from time to time.
Hard to argue with the team results listed above.
As a Cubs fan, the K’s are a bit concerning, but I’m not worried about Soler. He has good judgement, and I think he can lower his K rate a bit. The hope is Bryant will as well, but it may take a few years.
Baez is a big concern. He was repeatedly taking huge cuts at high fastballs and low and outside breaking stuff. He can’t make contact on that stuff, and will continue to K at a high rate if he keeps swinging at those pitches. Can he lay off those pitches? That will be interesting to watch.
This is terrible analysis.
A) You’re comparing minor league and/or partial-rookie-year K rates to MLB *career* K rates. That makes no sense whatsoever.
B) K rates have skyrocketed across all of baseball over the last 10 years. Comparing 2014 stats to those 10-30 years ago without adjustment is ridiculous.
Also the author didn’t account for pitchers (although the teams in top/bottom 5 stay the same minus Yankees). Obviously NL will K more than AL.
Might be best to compare K% to win% for more than one season, too.