Strasburg’s Debut vs. 29 Other Clubs
What if Stephen Strasburg had debuted against a team that can actually hit? In what should strike anyone as a ridiculous criticism, there have been a few people to point out that Strasburg didn’t exactly face a “real” major league line up in his record breaking major league debut. (A friend of mine joked that he made his 7th AAA start on Tuesday.) Yes–record breaking. I’ll add to Jack Moore’s point: Since 1920, only there have been only 67 games in which a pitcher has struck out 14 or more batters and walked none. Strasburg’s outing was noteworthy because his is the only one in which that happened with 24 or fewer batters faced. Given that only 66 other pitchers have ever done something like what Strasburg did in his debut, the level of the team he faced seems like a pretty trivial point. This was dominance like we rarely ever see.
Nevertheless, what if Strasburg had faced a “real” line up in his debut? One of the beauties of sabermetrics is that we get to have this argument with math. If, against a real line up, you think he would have looked ordinary and I think he would have looked pretty amazing, we can set aside arbitrary opinions, lay out some points of agreement, and use our calculators to answer the question. Well, that’s a stretch. But at least we can get a sense of the significance that the Pittsburgh lineup made.
Strasburg was obviously on last night. Did he bring his best stuff? Maybe. What we saw last night wasn’t his true talent level. Nobody is that good consistently. Let’s call the talent level Strasburg brought to his debut his instantaneous talent level. That instantaneous talent level faced was in the run scoring environment that the Pittsburg Pirates create. The comination of the two was a .194 wOBA. Sabermetrics gives us a tool for calculating match-ups known as a log5 calculation. If we assume that a .298 wOBA is the Buc’s real talent level, we can isolate Strasburg’s instantanous talent level and give the most rational possible answer to the question “what if he’d faced a real line up?”
I’ll cut to the chase and save you some algebra: his instantaneous wOBA-against was .218.
Going back to our log5 calculations, that means the Yankees, if they brought their MLB leading .361 wOBA to face Strasburg last night would have wOBA’d .248. That’s something like the Astros without Lance Berkman or Hunter Pence.
Here’s the same calculation for every other team in the league.
Yankees 0.243 Red Sox 0.240 Reds 0.234 Brewers 0.227 Tigers 0.226 Twins 0.225 Blue Jays 0.223 Rays 0.223 Braves 0.222 D-backs 0.220 Rangers 0.219 Cardinals 0.219 Phillies 0.219 Rockies 0.219 Royals 0.217 Nationals 0.216 Dodgers 0.216 Cubs 0.215 Marlins 0.213 Mets 0.213 Angels 0.212 Giants 0.212 White Sox 0.210 Athletics 0.210 Padres 0.202 Indians 0.202 Orioles 0.196 Mariners 0.195 Pirates 0.194 Astros 0.182
Anyway, we’ll never know what St. Stephen would have looked like against one of 29 other clubs on June 8th, 2010. That’s not the point. The point is that we witnessed one of the great pitching performances in the history of baseball. It was dominance. This post sheds a little light on what dominance means.
This is a fantastic point and something that really bothers me when people make fun of other teams. Teams rarely have batters or pitchers that are significantly worse than average. Unlike college and high school sports, MLB teams are quite even in talent. It’s only when a team has both a bad offense and defense that a team can really look bad. But when analyzing Strasburg’s performance we rally don’t care how bad their defense is and their offense is only about ~10% worse than an average MLB team.
Log5 is a great tool to use for fantasy purposes as well as I was just pointing out yesterday in a comment on THT.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/does-it-pay-to-play-the-matchups-with-your-sps/#comments