Javier Baez: It Won’t Mean a Thing if He Don’t Fix His Swing

“It looks like he’s going to be able to stay in an up-the-middle position on the defensive spectrum,” added the National League scout. “When you have a combination of speed, defense and power, like he has, that’s hard to find in the middle of the diamond. In the end, he looks like a player who has a chance to legitimately contribute to a major-league club on both the offensive and defensive sides of the ball.”

No, that scout wasn’t talking about Cubs uberprospect Javier Baez, but rather about Cubs ex-uberprospect Brett Jackson , as told to David Laurila back in March, 2011. Before Baez, and Jorge Soler, and Kris Bryant, it was Jackson who was the Anointed Expurgator of Ruminant Curses. As you probably know, the goat turned out to be too strong for B-Jax, who struck out at an epic 41.5% rate with the Cubs before being exiled to the minors, where his bat continued to avoid contact with the same unerring purpose with which children avoid vegetables. Theo ultimately traded him to the Diamondbacks for a few Jerry Colangelo bobbleheads.

Here’s Jackson’s line from his fly-on-windshield season in 2012 with the Cubs:

144 PA, 41.5% K, .175/.303/.342, 78 wRC+.

And here’s Javy’s line as of September 14:

166 PA, 41.6% K, .174/.229/.387, 68 wRC+.

Scary stuff, kids. Now several caveats obviously apply here, including small sample size. The players themselves are quite different. Jackson was a five tool guy who was good at everything but exceptional at nothing. While Baez has certainly had to rearrange his garage to fit all his tools, his calling card is Sheffield-like bat speed. Baez is almost without doubt the most exciting .174 hitter the game has ever seen. But the question is whether the rapidly bleaching bones of Brett Jackson’s career stand as a warning to Baez, and to those in the Cubs front office that see him as an anchor tenant at Wrigley for years to come.

To examine this, I compared Baez’s progress from high-A to the majors with Jackson’s, and I also threw in two guys that have had immediate success in The Show. George Springer (another high K guy) and Soler (a much more disciplined prospect).

Starting at high-A, the players looked like this:

Baez:          337 PA, 23.1& K, .274/.338./.535, 145 wRC+

Jackson:    312 PA, 20.2%, .316/.422/.517, 170 wRC+

Soler:         236 PA, 16.1% K, .281/.343/.467, 128 wRC+

Springer:   500 PA, 26.2% K, .316./.398/.557, 143 wRC+.

This includes only Baez’s high-A appearances in 2013 — I’m leaving out 86 PAs from 2012 in which Baez was only modestly effective. B-Jax wins this round, although Soler’s advanced approach is already apparent.  All four had good years.

Here’s how they performed at AA:

Baez:          240 PA, 28.8% K, .294/.346/.638, 180 wRC+

Jackson:    297 PA, 24.9% K, .256/.373./.443, 123 wRC+

Soler:           79 PA, 19.0% K, .415/.494/.862, 265 wRC+

Springer:  323 PA, 29.7% K, .297/.399/.579, 174 wRC+

Jackson had two roughly equivalent AA seasons in 2010 and 2011 — I’m showing the latter here. Springer had 87 difficult appearances in AA in 2012 — I’m showing his breakout 2013 season. All four struck out more often in AA, but all except Jackson improved on their performances at high-A. Soler’s numbers were insane, and the Cubs quickly promoted him to AAA to give him some more challenging pitches to work with.

And speaking of AAA:

Baez:         434 PA, 30.0% K, .260/.323/.510, 108 wRC+

Jackson:   467 PA, 33.8% K, .256/.348/.479, 107 wRC+

Soler:         127 PA, 20.5% K, .282/.378/.618, 149 wRC+

Springer:  266 PA, 24.4% K, .311/.425/.626, 175 wRC+

This is Jackson’s 2012 line at AAA. He put up a better wRC+ of 128 in 2011, in 215 appearances. I’m showing Springer’s AAA numbers for 2013; he had 61 arbitration-delaying PAs in 2014, in which he performed even better before being promoted. Springer actually improved his whiff rate in AAA, turning in a dominating season. Soler’s ludicrous AA numbers came somewhat back to Earth, but he still raked, with a K% only slightly worse than in AA.

Baez and Jackson, on the other hand, began shipping water. Their seasons were not horrible, but they performed significantly worse than they had in AA, with rising (and in B-Jax’ case, skyrocketing) strikeout rates. Both would carry their decaying swings to the major league level, where they both have paid a huge price, whiffing over 40% of the time. Springer also added about 10% to his K rate on reaching the majors, but he started from a lower base, and retained enough on-base to be a plus hitter (.231/.336/.468) before injuries sidelined him.

If Jackson represents the sum of all Baez’ fears, Springer represents the hope. Springer actually struck out more frequently than Baez in the lower minors, but Springer found a way to reduce his strikeout rate at AAA, and has found a way to produce at the major league level even while whiffing a third of the time. While Springer may not be able to sustain this productivity unless he once again addresses his contact problems, his strikeout rate isn’t unheard of in the majors. Baez’ rate, at 41%, lies largely outside the realm of civilized baseball discourse.

As of this writing, no qualifying hitter has a K rate anywhere near 40%. Indeed, there are only four hitters with a K rate exceeding 30% (Chris Davis, Chris Carter, Adam Dunn, and B.J. Upton). Two of these guys (Carter and Dunn) are have a wRC+ over 100; the other two do not. The worst career strikeout rate (minimum 1000 PAs) belongs to Tyler Flowers at 34.8%. No player has long survived in the majors beyond this forbidding boundary. The worst career K rate for a player with a career wRC+ over 100 is the aforementioned Chris Carter, checking in at 33.6%. Baez has a long way to go to even reach this dismal rate.

He has perhaps taken some baby steps: after striking out at a 42.2% clip in August, he’s shaved that to 40% in September. His last golden sombrero was on September 5, so it’s been over a week. Umm … yeah … these are the flimsiest of straws to grasp. With Addison Russell, Starlin Castro, and Kris Bryant all staking claims on the Cubs infield, Baez may be running out of time to prove that he can prevent strikeouts from getting his goat.





I'm a recovering lawyer and unrecovered Cubs fan who writes about baseball from time to time.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Otter
9 years ago

This is excellent. Nothing to add, just wanted to praise this.

aws77@cornell.edu
9 years ago

Agreed. Great work comparing them at each level.

tz
9 years ago

Ditto.

The one thing Baez has going for him is youth, being a couple years younger than Jackson or Springer was at the comparable minor-league levels. If he can cut the strikeouts down at the big-league level, he can still live up to the hype.

Lee Trocinskimember
9 years ago

Darn, I thought this was actually going to be a swing analysis. It seems like his one main problem is closing his front shoulder too far, which causes the rest of the problems (casting and opening up early for starters). I’d even argue it’s his eye, not his contact abilities, causing the most problems. His chase rate is high and his in-zone swing rate is near average, so he’s swinging at the wrong pitches. I’d even venture saying that he goes back down to AAA for a bit next year, now that he knows he can’t get away with his old habits at the big-league level.

Chris Mitchellmember
9 years ago

Nice work. I definitely agree that Baez needs to do something about the strikeouts, but I’d also argue that he’s more Springer than Jackson due to his power output. In any case, Springer, Baez, and Joey Gallo should be interesting case studies, as not too many hitters have survived while striking out as often as they do.

Ron Sullivan
9 years ago

Baez is the equivalent of golfs long drive champions. These guys have incredible club head speed, and yet they are missing the finesse of the tour player. I often hear comparisons of Baez and Sheffield and other than bat speed I find it hard to see a relationship. Do they both waggle the bat, yes? Is their waggle the same, not even close. A fair comparison would be BJ Upton and Baez. Neither player has a clue where the bat head is when the swing takes off after their weight shifts

Dovif
9 years ago
Reply to  Ron Sullivan

It is more the ball accidentally hitting the swing for Baez

editor guy
9 years ago

I no longer find the comparisons to prior players at equivalent levels to be very useful unless there is an especially compelling reason for the choice of those players. It represents problems of multiple comparisons and data mining that have to be removed from statistical analysis.

These are invoked less than small sample size caveats, but can equally invalidate a quantitative analysis.

editor guy
9 years ago

The title here says it all. He is clearly overmatched, and big dose of crow is probably the most effective way to convince him of such.

Time will tell, but he’s got a lot of lives to use up because of age, defensive spectrum position, athleticism, and prospect pedigree. My guess is he’ll find a home, though he probably won’t ever shed the worst of his habits (bad strikeout rate). But, he’ll be given a lot of chances to figure it out.

hopefulcubsfan
9 years ago

Great stuff — thanks. I’m grasping at straws and using an absurdly small sample size, but note the following as evidence of a glimmer of hope for javy:
1. First 113 AB in AAA — 11 walks; next 75 AB in AAA — 3 walks.
First 112 AB in Majors — 4 walks;next 75 AB in majors (through yesterday) — 11 walks.
So maybe Javy has become a quicker study?
2. Home slash lines: 154/217/264
Road slash lines: 198/253/457
Road numbers should be better indicator of true ability? (Though poor performance at Wrigley must be fixed if he is to be a Cub.)
As I said, I’m just looking for hopeful signs. Thoughts?