How Plate Discipline Impacts wRC+
Like many of you, I spend hours on FanGraphs trying to take in as much information as possible. One of the more fascinating statistics to me is the category of plate discipline. This includes how often a batter will swing on a pitch inside or outside of the zone, how often a batter swings and misses, and many other variables that affect a player’s approach at the plate. While these numbers alone are a good indication on how a player acts at bat, I wanted to know how these numbers affected performance. For instance, it would make sense that a higher O-Swing% could lead to less-than-average hitting. The 2015 season had Adam Jones second in O-Swing%, swinging at 47% of pitches outside of the strike zone. Pablo Sandoval led the league in O-Swing% with a 48% rate. Jones recorded a 109 wRC+ while the Kung Fu Panda had a 75 wRC+.
By breaking down these Plate Discipline statistics for the 2015 season, I believe that we can get a good answer on which statistic leads to the best performance. For my methodology, I used the wRC+ and Plate Discipline leaderboard for the 2015 season. After breaking down each statistic, I compiled a top 10 and bottom 10 wRC+. Additionally, I grouped percentages to get the number of batters and average wRC+ for certain percentages.
O-Swing %
O-Swing% = Swings at pitches outside the zone / pitches outside the zone
Top 10 wRC+ Average: 97
Name | O-Swing% | wRC+ |
Pablo Sandoval | 47.80% | 75 |
Adam Jones | 46.50% | 109 |
Avisail Garcia | 45.20% | 83 |
Marlon Byrd | 43.90% | 100 |
Salvador Perez | 42.50% | 87 |
Kevin Pillar | 40.10% | 93 |
Starling Marte | 39.40% | 117 |
Gerardo Parra | 39.40% | 108 |
Freddy Galvis | 39.20% | 76 |
Nolan Arenado | 38.50% | 119 |
Bottom 10 wRC+ Average: 132
Name | O-Swing% | wRC+ |
Brett Gardner | 22.90% | 105 |
Ben Zobrist | 22.60% | 123 |
Matt Carpenter | 22.50% | 139 |
Paul Goldschmidt | 22.40% | 164 |
Jose Bautista | 22.20% | 148 |
Carlos Santana | 21.10% | 110 |
Francisco Cervelli | 20.90% | 119 |
Dexter Fowler | 20.90% | 110 |
Curtis Granderson | 19.90% | 132 |
Joey Votto | 19.10% | 172 |
Percentage | Count | Average wRC+ |
40%-48% | 6 | 91 |
30%-39% | 73 | 106 |
20%-29% | 60 | 117 |
< 20% | 2 | 152 |
O-Swing% gives us a pretty good indication of a player’s overall performance. It’s no surprise that patience and a good eye are part of a skill set that leads to a higher wRC+. For each 10-percent decrease of O-Swing percentage, batters see an increase of over 10 points for their wRC+. The top 10 wRC+ compared to the bottom 10 also tells a compelling story of what O-Swing tells us. In the top 10, we see a couple of above-average hitters like Starling Marte and Nolan Arenado. However, we also see five of the top 10 with a wRC+ under 100 and one hitter (Marlon Byrd) at 100. On the other side of the spectrum, there isn’t a hitter under 100 wRC+ in the bottom 10. The difference in wRC+ between the top and bottom 10 is 35, the biggest difference between all the statistics.
Let’s look at two very different extremes: Joey Votto and Pablo Sandoval. Sandoval had an O-Swing% of 48 percent while Votto had a 19 percent rate, which means that while Sandoval is swinging at almost half of the balls he faces, Votto is taking a little more than 80% of pitches out of the zone. Sandoval faced 1848 pitches (1287 strikes to 561 balls) while Votto faced 3020 pitches (1644 strikes to 1376 balls). Sandoval’s more than double strike-to-ball ratio and Votto leading the league in walks can both be explained by their O-Swing percentage.
Z-Swing %
Z-Swing% = Swings at pitches inside the zone / pitches inside the zone
Top 10 wRC+ Average: 111
Name | Z-Swing% | wRC+ |
Marlon Byrd | 83.20% | 100 |
Brandon Belt | 80.90% | 135 |
Adam Jones | 80.60% | 109 |
Avisail Garcia | 78.90% | 83 |
Billy Burns | 78.80% | 102 |
Carlos Gonzalez | 78.10% | 114 |
Ryan Howard | 77.80% | 92 |
Starling Marte | 77.50% | 117 |
Kris Bryant | 76.20% | 136 |
Brandon Crawford | 76.10% | 117 |
Bottom 10 wRC+ Average: 115
Name | Z-Swing% | wRC+ |
Carlos Santana | 57.90% | 110 |
Logan Forsythe | 57.70% | 126 |
Joe Mauer | 57.50% | 94 |
Brock Holt | 57.40% | 98 |
Brett Gardner | 55.80% | 105 |
Brian McCann | 55.80% | 105 |
Mookie Betts | 55.70% | 119 |
Mike Trout | 55.60% | 172 |
Ben Zobrist | 55.40% | 123 |
Martin Prado | 53.20% | 100 |
Percentage | Count | Average wRC+ |
80%-83% | 3 | 115 |
70%-79% | 51 | 111 |
60%-69% | 75 | 110 |
50%-59% | 12 | 114 |
The first thing that I noticed when looking at the Z-Swing charts is the duplication of names from the O-Swing charts. Adam Jones, Avisail Garcia, Marlon Byrd, and Starling Marte showed up on both the O and Z Swing percentage top-10 while Ben Zobrist, Carlos Santana, and Brett Gardner appeared on both bottom-10 lists. This is a very mixed bag of players for both the top and bottom. Both have a 100 wRC+ hitter, the epitome of average. Both have seven hitters batting above 100 wRC+ meaning that both lists also have two hitters batting below 100. The top and bottom 10 averages are almost even. The one outlier that separates them is Mike Trout in the bottom 10 with a 172 wRC+. Seeing the same name on multiple lists can tell us a lot about a player. Someone like Marlon Byrd will swing at most of the pitches you send his way while Ben Zobrist will take a pitch outside of the zone about 77% of the time but will also take a strike 45% of the time as well.
O-Contact %
O-Contact% = Number of pitches on which contact was made on pitches outside the zone / Swings on pitches outside the zone
Top 10 wRC+ Average: 104
Name | O-Contact% | wRC+ |
Nick Markakis | 86.10% | 107 |
Michael Brantley | 84.60% | 135 |
Daniel Murphy | 83.50% | 110 |
Ender Inciarte | 82.30% | 100 |
Melky Cabrera | 82.10% | 91 |
Wilmer Flores | 82.00% | 95 |
Jose Altuve | 81.70% | 120 |
Ben Zobrist | 80.90% | 123 |
Angel Pagan | 80.80% | 81 |
Yadier Molina | 80.20% | 80 |
Bottom 10 wRC+ Average: 104
Name | O-Contact% | wRC+ |
Anthony Gose | 55.00% | 90 |
Avisail Garcia | 55.00% | 83 |
Nick Castellanos | 53.20% | 94 |
Ryan Howard | 52.80% | 92 |
Michael Taylor | 52.10% | 69 |
Justin Upton | 51.50% | 120 |
Addison Russell | 51.10% | 90 |
Chris Davis | 50.90% | 147 |
Kris Bryant | 49.20% | 136 |
Joc Pederson | 49.00% | 115 |
Percentage | Count | Average wRC+ |
80%-86% | 10 | 104 |
70%-79% | 46 | 103 |
60%-69% | 60 | 118 |
50%-59% | 23 | 105 |
< 50% | 2 | 126 |
Similar to Z-Swing%, O-Contact doesn’t show much disparity between the top and bottom 10. In fact, they’re identical at 104 wRC+. A higher O-Contact gives a batter more balls in play, but doesn’t always lead to success. My initial thought was that swinging at a pitch way out of the zone can lead to weak contact, and usually an out. The fact the top and bottom are identical shows that this isn’t always the case. It also makes sense why the middle of the pack (60%-69%) has the greatest wRC+ (besides the small sample size of < 50%). These batters are still able to make contact with pitches outside of the zone more than half of the time, but also miss the pitch enough of the time where they don’t make bad contact.
Z-Contact %
Z-Contact% = Number of pitches on which contact was made on pitches inside the zone / Swings on pitches inside the zone
Top 10 wRC+ Average: 110
Name | Z-Contact% | wRC+ |
Daniel Murphy | 97.50% | 110 |
Ben Revere | 96.70% | 98 |
Michael Brantley | 96.30% | 135 |
Yangervis Solarte | 95.50% | 109 |
Martin Prado | 95.40% | 100 |
A.J. Pollock | 94.60% | 132 |
Jose Altuve | 94.60% | 120 |
Ian Kinsler | 94.50% | 111 |
Erick Aybar | 94.30% | 80 |
Ender Inciarte | 94.20% | 100 |
Bottom 10 wRC+ Average: 125
Name | Z-Contact% | wRC+ |
Mark Trumbo | 80.90% | 108 |
Brandon Belt | 80.70% | 135 |
J.D. Martinez | 80.60% | 137 |
Nelson Cruz | 79.30% | 158 |
Justin Upton | 78.00% | 120 |
Michael Taylor | 77.40% | 69 |
Joc Pederson | 77.00% | 115 |
Chris Davis | 76.50% | 147 |
Alex Rodriguez | 76.50% | 129 |
Kris Bryant | 75.80% | 136 |
Percentage | Count | Average wRC+ |
90%-98% | 55 | 106 |
80%-89% | 79 | 113 |
70%-79% | 7 | 125 |
Z-Contact was the most surprising statistic in terms on its effect on wRC+, until you look at the names in the bottom 10. One would expect that hitters that hit more pitches in the zone would be the better performers. However, the bottom 10 is filled with power hitters, leading to the main difference in wRC+. Davis and Cruz were number one and two in terms of home-run leaders in 2015. In fact, besides Michael Taylor, the bottom 10 is all in the top 50 for home runs in the MLB. The list makes sense as players like Chris Davis are trying to “Crush” the ball out of the park and swing harder than someone in the top 10 like Martin Prado.
SwStrike %
SwStr% = Swings and misses / Total pitches
Top 10 wRC+ Average: 110
Name | SwStr% | wRC+ |
Avisail Garcia | 17.30% | 83 |
Marlon Byrd | 17.20% | 100 |
Ryan Howard | 16.60% | 92 |
Kris Bryant | 16.50% | 136 |
Michael Taylor | 16.00% | 69 |
Chris Davis | 15.60% | 147 |
Carlos Gonzalez | 15.20% | 114 |
J.D. Martinez | 14.90% | 137 |
Mark Trumbo | 14.60% | 108 |
Joc Pederson | 14.00% | 115 |
Bottom 10 wRC+ Average: 105
Name | SwStr% | wRC+ |
Ian Kinsler | 5.20% | 111 |
Ender Inciarte | 4.90% | 100 |
Andrelton Simmons | 4.90% | 82 |
Angel Pagan | 4.40% | 81 |
Martin Prado | 4.30% | 100 |
Ben Zobrist | 4.20% | 123 |
Nick Markakis | 4.10% | 107 |
Ben Revere | 4.10% | 98 |
Daniel Murphy | 3.90% | 110 |
Michael Brantley | 3.10% | 135 |
Percentage | Count | Average wRC+ |
15%-18% | 7 | 106 |
12%-14.9% | 20 | 107 |
9%-11.9% | 36 | 117 |
6%-8.9% | 50 | 114 |
3%-5.9% | 17 | 106 |
Not surprisingly, the top 10 for SwStrike looks a combination of both the O-Contact and Z-Contact bottom 10. Obviously if your contact is low, you’re going to have more swings and misses. The main factor that stood out to me looking at the top and bottom 10 is the deviation of wRC+. The top 10 is all over the place, having players like Kris Bryant with a 136 wRC+, Michael Taylor with 69, and every level of player in between. The bottom 10 has less variation, providing a more consistent group of hitters.
Totals
Category | Top 10 | Bottom 10 | Difference (Bottom to Top) |
O-Swing% | 97 | 132 | 35 |
Z-Swing% | 111 | 115 | 4 |
O-Contact% | 104 | 104 | 0 |
Z-Contact% | 110 | 125 | 15 |
SwStr% | 110 | 105 | -5 |
As evidenced by the chart, the main statistic in regards to plate discipline to show a great change in performance that compares the bottom to the top level is O-Swing percentage. Z-Contact seems to also be relevant when evaluating and predicting a player’s performance.
Very good article, interesting to see that the most disciplined players are generally the most productive. You see a lot of guys who are free swingers generally with a lot of XBH and as a result you assume that they end up being the most productive of the lot. Carlos Santana, is an especially interesting case. Very disciplined yet only a 110 wRC+, you’d thin that’d be a lot higher with his discipline.
How much of the WRC+ gain is related to an increase in OBP? In other words, does it make them more effective BIP hitters, or are we simply saying that not swinging at balls leads to more walks.
Good question. O-Swing and Z-Contact correlate the best in regards to the percentage and wRC+. So, as the percentage decreases for both categories, the average wRC+ and OPB increase. OBP increases for every interval that Z-Swing decreases (.318, .330, ,337, .349). O-Contact had the top 10 at .334 and the bottom 10 at .321. The top two intervals for SwStr (15-18 and 12-14.9) had the bottom two lowest OBP averages (.316 and .318) while the bottom two intervals (3-5.9 and 6-8.9) were tied for the highest average OBP (.340).