Historical Relevance of Elite Rookie Seasons
As of this writing, Tyler Naquin is running a wRC+ of 171 through 196 plate appearances. While still statistically a fairly small sample size, it’s enough to be a qualified rookie season. If the season were over today, Naquin’s 171 would be the fourth-highest for a qualified rookie ever.
Now there’s a lot of discussion about Naquin’s impending regression. Even though Naquin has always had a high BABIP profile (over .350 through minors), his current mark of .417 is clearly unsustainable. It’s also hard to see someone continuing to hit home runs at over four times the frequency he did in the minors.
I’m not going to debate what his regression might look like, or where his true-talent level might be. I am just going to look at the fact that he has had an incredible rookie season so far. Even with some significant regressions in the second half, Naquin is well set up to put up some pretty gaudy rookie numbers. So, I decided to take a look at some of the other best rookie seasons ever, and how these players fared in the rest of their careers. Since 1901, there have been 30 qualified rookie hitters (if you include Naquin) to post a wRC+ of at least 150, a mark that even with some significant regression, Naquin should have a chance to exceed.
# | Name | Team | G | PA | HR | R | RBI | SB | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | wRC+ | BsR | Off | Def | WAR |
1 | Willie McCovey | Giants | 52 | 219 | 13 | 32 | 38 | 2 | 10% | 16% | 0.302 | 0.379 | 0.354 | 0.429 | 0.656 | 0.467 | 185 | 0.5 | 24 | -1.8 | 3.1 |
2 | Frank Thomas | White Sox | 60 | 240 | 7 | 39 | 31 | 0 | 18% | 23% | 0.199 | 0.421 | 0.33 | 0.454 | 0.529 | 0.437 | 178 | -0.5 | 20.7 | -5.7 | 2.4 |
3 | Joe Jackson | – – – | 177 | 768 | 8 | 144 | 100 | 45 | 9% | 0.173 | 0.391 | 0.449 | 0.564 | 0.476 | 178 | 2 | 76.2 | -3 | 10.2 | ||
4 | Tyler Naquin | Indians | 63 | 196 | 12 | 32 | 29 | 3 | 9% | 29% | 0.313 | 0.417 | 0.324 | 0.387 | 0.636 | 0.426 | 171 | 0.8 | 17.6 | -2.5 | 2.2 |
5 | Bret Barberie | Expos | 57 | 162 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0 | 12% | 14% | 0.162 | 0.4 | 0.353 | 0.435 | 0.515 | 0.418 | 169 | 0 | 12.6 | 1 | 2 |
6 | Bernie Carbo | Reds | 129 | 470 | 21 | 54 | 63 | 10 | 20% | 17% | 0.239 | 0.341 | 0.307 | 0.451 | 0.546 | 0.438 | 168 | 0.6 | 40.5 | -3.2 | 5.6 |
7 | Jose Abreu | White Sox | 145 | 622 | 36 | 80 | 107 | 3 | 8% | 21% | 0.264 | 0.356 | 0.317 | 0.383 | 0.581 | 0.411 | 167 | -2.9 | 42.7 | -14.4 | 5.3 |
8 | Bill Skowron | Yankees | 87 | 237 | 7 | 37 | 41 | 2 | 8% | 8% | 0.237 | 0.344 | 0.34 | 0.392 | 0.577 | 0.429 | 166 | 0.2 | 18.5 | -5.6 | 2.1 |
9 | Benny Kauff | – – – | 159 | 681 | 8 | 124 | 97 | 76 | 11% | 8% | 0.162 | 0.4 | 0.368 | 0.447 | 0.529 | 0.463 | 166 | 12.4 | 65.6 | 1.6 | 9.9 |
10 | Fred Lynn | Red Sox | 160 | 656 | 23 | 108 | 115 | 10 | 10% | 15% | 0.238 | 0.37 | 0.338 | 0.408 | 0.576 | 0.434 | 166 | 0.2 | 48.3 | 4.8 | 7.9 |
11 | Rico Carty | Braves | 135 | 507 | 22 | 72 | 88 | 1 | 9% | 16% | 0.223 | 0.357 | 0.328 | 0.387 | 0.551 | 0.408 | 164 | -0.4 | 36.3 | -9 | 4.9 |
12 | Bill Salkeld | Pirates | 95 | 317 | 15 | 45 | 52 | 2 | 16% | 5% | 0.236 | 0.288 | 0.311 | 0.42 | 0.547 | 0.451 | 161 | 0.2 | 23.2 | 2.7 | 3.9 |
13 | Yasiel Puig | Dodgers | 104 | 432 | 19 | 66 | 42 | 11 | 8% | 23% | 0.215 | 0.383 | 0.319 | 0.391 | 0.534 | 0.398 | 160 | -3 | 26.2 | -0.7 | 4.1 |
14 | Buck Herzog | Giants | 64 | 213 | 0 | 38 | 11 | 16 | 17% | 0.063 | 0.3 | 0.448 | 0.363 | 0.405 | 160 | 1.1 | 14 | -0.2 | 2.5 | ||
15 | Dick Allen | Phillies | 172 | 733 | 29 | 131 | 93 | 3 | 9% | 20% | 0.236 | 0.367 | 0.317 | 0.378 | 0.553 | 0.401 | 160 | -0.7 | 48.9 | 1.6 | 8.3 |
16 | Carlton Fisk | Red Sox | 147 | 568 | 24 | 81 | 67 | 5 | 9% | 17% | 0.239 | 0.32 | 0.292 | 0.363 | 0.531 | 0.401 | 160 | 0.4 | 34.2 | 11.7 | 7.1 |
17 | Albert Pujols | Cardinals | 161 | 676 | 37 | 112 | 130 | 1 | 10% | 14% | 0.281 | 0.336 | 0.329 | 0.403 | 0.61 | 0.423 | 159 | -1.1 | 50.7 | 0.9 | 7.2 |
18 | Stan Musial | Cardinals | 152 | 585 | 11 | 95 | 79 | 7 | 11% | 4% | 0.173 | 0.327 | 0.325 | 0.402 | 0.498 | 0.42 | 158 | 1.1 | 38.6 | 1.7 | 6.1 |
19 | Al Bumbry | Orioles | 119 | 406 | 7 | 78 | 34 | 24 | 8% | 12% | 0.163 | 0.375 | 0.338 | 0.398 | 0.501 | 0.403 | 158 | 0.8 | 27.3 | -5.5 | 3.8 |
20 | Mitchell Page | Athletics | 145 | 592 | 21 | 85 | 75 | 42 | 13% | 16% | 0.214 | 0.343 | 0.307 | 0.405 | 0.521 | 0.404 | 157 | 6.9 | 46.9 | -6 | 6.2 |
21 | Brett Lawrie | Blue Jays | 43 | 171 | 9 | 26 | 25 | 7 | 9% | 18% | 0.287 | 0.318 | 0.293 | 0.373 | 0.58 | 0.407 | 157 | 2.2 | 13.4 | 5.5 | 2.6 |
22 | Ted Williams | Red Sox | 149 | 677 | 31 | 131 | 145 | 2 | 16% | 10% | 0.281 | 0.328 | 0.327 | 0.436 | 0.609 | 0.464 | 156 | -0.4 | 52.7 | -4.4 | 7.1 |
23 | Johnny Mize | Cardinals | 126 | 469 | 19 | 76 | 93 | 1 | 11% | 7% | 0.249 | 0.322 | 0.329 | 0.402 | 0.577 | 0.436 | 156 | 0 | 33.5 | -2.5 | 4.3 |
24 | Ryan Braun | Brewers | 113 | 492 | 34 | 91 | 97 | 15 | 6% | 23% | 0.31 | 0.361 | 0.324 | 0.37 | 0.634 | 0.421 | 155 | 1.3 | 36.3 | -26.9 | 2.5 |
25 | Mike Trout | Angels | 179 | 774 | 35 | 149 | 99 | 53 | 10% | 22% | 0.226 | 0.358 | 0.306 | 0.379 | 0.532 | 0.389 | 153 | 15.9 | 63.9 | 15.5 | 11 |
26 | Erubiel Durazo | D-backs | 52 | 185 | 11 | 31 | 30 | 1 | 14% | 23% | 0.265 | 0.385 | 0.329 | 0.422 | 0.594 | 0.43 | 151 | -0.2 | 12.5 | -1.4 | 1.6 |
27 | Kal Daniels | Reds | 74 | 207 | 6 | 34 | 23 | 15 | 11% | 15% | 0.199 | 0.356 | 0.32 | 0.398 | 0.519 | 0.402 | 151 | 2.2 | 14.3 | -1.8 | 2 |
28 | Miguel Sano | Twins | 80 | 335 | 18 | 46 | 52 | 1 | 16% | 36% | 0.262 | 0.396 | 0.269 | 0.385 | 0.53 | 0.392 | 151 | -4.8 | 14.8 | -6.6 | 2 |
29 | Mark McGwire | Athletics | 169 | 699 | 52 | 107 | 127 | 1 | 11% | 21% | 0.316 | 0.285 | 0.28 | 0.361 | 0.597 | 0.4 | 150 | -0.9 | 44 | -18.5 | 4.8 |
30 | Fred Snodgrass | Giants | 157 | 579 | 3 | 81 | 51 | 44 | 14% | 11% | 0.111 | 0.365 | 0.317 | 0.431 | 0.428 | 0.421 | 150 | 3.3 | 36.6 | -3.9 | 5.9 |
It’s easy to see that Naquin puts himself in some impressive company on this list. I wanted to see how likely it is for an elite rookie season to lead to a successful MLB career. Next is a list these players including their career WAR and wRC+ compared to what they did as rookies.
# | Name | Team | G | PA | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
1 | Willie McCovey | Giants | 52 | 219 | 185 | 3.1 | 67.4 | 145 | 22 |
2 | Frank Thomas | White Sox | 60 | 240 | 178 | 2.4 | 72 | 154 | 18 |
3 | Joe Jackson | – – – | 177 | 768 | 178 | 10.2 | 60.5 | 165 | 13 |
4 | Bret Barberie | Expos | 57 | 162 | 169 | 2 | 7.5 | 99 | 6 |
5 | Bernie Carbo | Reds | 129 | 470 | 168 | 5.6 | 20.6 | 128 | 12 |
6 | Jose Abreu | White Sox | 145 | 622 | 167 | 5.3 | 8 | 134 | 3 |
7 | Bill Skowron | Yankees | 87 | 237 | 166 | 2.1 | 28.6 | 118 | 14 |
8 | Benny Kauff | – – – | 159 | 681 | 166 | 9.9 | 34.1 | 149 | 8 |
9 | Fred Lynn | Red Sox | 160 | 656 | 166 | 7.9 | 49.2 | 129 | 17 |
10 | Rico Carty | Braves | 135 | 507 | 164 | 4.9 | 34.7 | 132 | 17 |
11 | Bill Salkeld | Pirates | 95 | 317 | 161 | 3.9 | 8.7 | 137 | 6 |
12 | Yasiel Puig | Dodgers | 104 | 432 | 160 | 4.1 | 11.3 | 134 | 4 |
13 | Buck Herzog | Giants | 64 | 213 | 160 | 2.5 | 28.6 | 97 | 13 |
14 | Dick Allen | Phillies | 172 | 733 | 160 | 8.3 | 61.3 | 155 | 15 |
15 | Carlton Fisk | Red Sox | 147 | 568 | 160 | 7.1 | 68.3 | 117 | 25 |
16 | Albert Pujols | Cardinals | 161 | 676 | 159 | 7.2 | 91.1 | 154 | 16 |
17 | Stan Musial | Cardinals | 152 | 585 | 158 | 6.1 | 126.8 | 158 | 23 |
18 | Al Bumbry | Orioles | 119 | 406 | 158 | 3.8 | 22.6 | 106 | 14 |
19 | Mitchell Page | Athletics | 145 | 592 | 157 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 118 | 8 |
20 | Brett Lawrie | Blue Jays | 43 | 171 | 157 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 100 | 6 |
21 | Ted Williams | Red Sox | 149 | 677 | 156 | 7.1 | 130.4 | 188 | 19 |
22 | Johnny Mize | Cardinals | 126 | 469 | 156 | 4.3 | 68.6 | 157 | 18 |
23 | Ryan Braun | Brewers | 113 | 492 | 155 | 2.5 | 36.9 | 141 | 10 |
24 | Mike Trout | Angels | 179 | 774 | 153 | 11 | 44.4 | 167 | 5 |
25 | Erubiel Durazo | Diamondbacks | 52 | 185 | 151 | 1.6 | 9.2 | 124 | 7 |
26 | Kal Daniels | Reds | 74 | 207 | 151 | 2 | 16.9 | 140 | 7 |
27 | Miguel Sano | Twins | 80 | 335 | 151 | 2 | 2.9 | 132 | 2 |
28 | Mark McGwire | Athletics | 169 | 699 | 150 | 4.8 | 66.3 | 157 | 16 |
29 | Fred Snodgrass | Giants | 157 | 579 | 150 | 5.9 | 19.7 | 114 | 8 |
Finally, I have broken these careers down into tiers, just as a quick visual. These tiers are loosely based mostly on career WAR. I am not considering controversies surrounding these players (e.g. McGwire, Jackson), just what they accomplished at the plate.
Tier 1 – “First Ballot” Hall of Fame Talent – 5 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Ted Williams | 156 | 7.1 | 130.4 | 188 | 19 |
Stan Musial | 158 | 6.1 | 126.8 | 158 | 23 |
Albert Pujols | 159 | 7.2 | 91.1 | 154 | 16 |
Joe Jackson | 178 | 10.2 | 60.5 | 165 | 13 |
Mike Trout | 153 | 11 | 44.4 | 167 | 5 |
Not much to say here, you all know these names. Yes, I put Trout here already; I don’t think anyone is arguing how good a player he is at this point. Jackson was placed here because, again, I’m just looking at how good a player these players individually were.
Tier 2 – “Fringe” Hall of Fame Talent – 6 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Willie McCovey | 185 | 3.1 | 67.4 | 145 | 22 |
Frank Thomas | 178 | 2.4 | 72 | 154 | 18 |
Dick Allen | 160 | 8.3 | 61.3 | 155 | 15 |
Carlton Fisk | 160 | 7.1 | 68.3 | 117 | 25 |
Johnny Mize | 156 | 4.3 | 68.6 | 157 | 18 |
Mark McGwire | 150 | 4.8 | 66.3 | 157 | 16 |
Fringe HOF was just what I named this group, based on career WAR. Obviously some of these players are much less “fringe” than others when it comes to actual voting, but regardless, all of these players had long careers of being excellent hitters.
Tier 3 – Starter Talent – 5 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Benny Kauff | 166 | 9.9 | 34.1 | 149 | 8 |
Fred Lynn | 166 | 7.9 | 49.2 | 129 | 17 |
Rico Carty | 164 | 4.9 | 34.7 | 132 | 17 |
Bill Skowron | 166 | 2.1 | 28.6 | 118 | 14 |
Buck Herzog | 160 | 2.5 | 28.6 | 97 | 13 |
Group of players with great, but not generally HOF-quality careers. You’ll notice here that Herzog didn’t actually maintain above-average offense throughout his career, but he was able to find success as a great defensive player.
Tier 4 – Successful MLB careers – 4 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Bernie Carbo | 168 | 5.6 | 20.6 | 128 | 12 |
Al Bumbry | 158 | 3.8 | 22.6 | 106 | 14 |
Kal Daniels | 151 | 2 | 16.9 | 140 | 7 |
Fred Snodgrass | 150 | 5.9 | 19.7 | 114 | 8 |
The difference between a successful MLB career and a bust is extremely relative. I put the cutoff at 10 WAR, which seems to me like a mark you would expect to be able to reach after putting up one of the greatest rookie seasons ever.
Tier 5 – Relative Bust – 4 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Erubiel Durazo | 151 | 1.6 | 9.2 | 124 | 7 |
Mitchell Page | 157 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 118 | 8 |
Bill Salkeld | 161 | 3.9 | 8.7 | 137 | 6 |
Bret Barberie | 169 | 2 | 7.5 | 99 | 6 |
None of these players lived up to what they produced in their rookie seasons. However, you do see that this is still a group with generally good offensive production throughout their careers.
Jury’s Out – 5 Players
Name | wRC+ | WAR | Career WAR | Career wRC+ | Seasons |
Miguel Sano | 151 | 2 | 2.9 | 132 | 2 |
Ryan Braun | 155 | 2.5 | 36.9 | 141 | 10 |
Brett Lawrie | 157 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 100 | 6 |
Yasiel Puig | 160 | 4.1 | 11.3 | 134 | 4 |
Jose Abreu | 167 | 5.3 | 8 | 134 | 3 |
And finally, we have a few active players where it’s too early to call what class of career they are going to have.
So what does this all mean for Tyler Naquin? Well, probably not as much as an irrational Cleveland fan such as myself might hope. There is no ignoring though that there is an exceptional success rate for players who hit this well as a rookie. 75% were able to run career WAR totals over 20, and about half of those made it to 60!
Now there are going to be a lot of people who argue that Naquin’s minor-league track record might suggest that he is still likely to end up somewhere in that bottom 25% group. I don’t know how good Naquin really is, or how good he might be. I do know that he has put himself in a group with some impressive names, and I am quite excited to see how his career plays out.
Why is Ryan Braun in the jury’s out? He has been better than all the starter talent group, and he has done it in only 10 years.